- Author Guidelines
- Editorial Team
- Focus and Scope
- Publication Ethics
- Open Access Policy
- Peer Reviewer Process
- Article Processing Charges
- Copyright Notice
- Editorial Address
- Journal Archiving
- Journal License
- Reference Management
- Sceering Plagiarism
- Visitor Statistics
- Peer Reviewers
- Contact Us
- Indexing Page
Peer Review Process
Peer Review Process
Every article that goes to the editorial staff will be selected through the Initial Review process by the Editorial Board. Then, the articles will be sent to the Mitra Bebestari/ peer reviewer and will go to the next selection by the Double Blind Preview Process. After that, the articles will be returned to the authors to revise. These processes take some weeks for a maximum time. In each manuscript, Mitra Bebestari/ peer reviewer will be rated on the substantial and technical aspects. Mitra Bebestari/ peer reviewer that collaboration with Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika is the experts in the Education area and issues around it. They were experienced in the prestigious journal management and publication that was spread around the nationally and abroad. All submitted manuscripts are read by the editorial staff. Those manuscripts evaluated by editors to be inappropriate to the journal criteria are rejected promptly without external review. Manuscripts evaluated to be of potential interest to our readership are sent to double-blind reviewers. The editors then make a decision based on the reviewer's recommendation from among several possibilities: rejected, revision required, or accepted. The editor has the right to decide which manuscripts submitted to the journal should be published. Review Process :
- Author submit the manuscript
- Editor Evaluation (some manuscript are rejected or returned before the review process)
- Bind peer review process
- Editor Decision
- Confirmation to the author







